USPTO serial 97728729
ITAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ITAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey J. Schwartz
Jeffrey J. Schwartz SCHWARTZ LAW FIRM, P.C.6100 FAIRVIEW ROAD, SUITE 1135CHARLOTTE, NC 28210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless electronic devices for locating, tracking and identifying assets, equipment, articles and luggage; wireless electronic devices for locating, tracking and identifying packages delivered to multifamily buildings; wireless electronic devices for locating and tracking personnel for business purposes; miniaturized programmable display devices, wireless display devices; electronic baggage tags | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2026 |
| 035 | Providing electronic tracking services for locating, tracking and identifying assets, equipment, articles, and luggage of others; electronic tracking services for locating, tracking and identifying packages delivered to multifamily buildings; electronic tracking services for locating and tracking personnel for business purposes | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |