Drawing for DINAPOLI

USPTO serial 97739860

DINAPOLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINAPOLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jorge Arciniega

Jorge Arciniega LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD., SUITE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned tomatoes, canned tomato puree, tomato paste, and canned tomato pasteACTIVESep 15, 1951
030Sauces, namely, tomato sauce, pizza sauce, and marinara sauceACTIVEDec 31, 1970

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 2, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 2, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 25, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 19, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2023LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 27, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2023LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 26, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance