USPTO serial 97750144
PURESCRIPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS,KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PURESCRIPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
Douglas T. Johnson MILLER & MARTIN PLLC832 GEORGIA AVENUESUITE 1200 VOLUNTEER BUILDINGCHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | online wholesale and retail store services featuring vitamin and mineral supplements; online wholesale and retail store services featuring nutritional supplements for general health and well-being, dietary supplements for general health and well-being, herbal supplements for general health and well-being, mineral supplements, and vitamin supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |