USPTO serial 97751072
SWARM CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWARM CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Taipei City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BOULEVARDSUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cargo handling machines; Conveyers being machines; Industrial robots; Mechanical and hydraulic lifts; Motors, other than for land vehicles; Shock absorbers for machines; Transmission mechanisms, other than for land vehicles; Transmissions for machines; Belt conveyors | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2022 |
| 009 | Acceleration sensors; Apparatus for transmission of communication; Batteries, electric; Battery chargers; Downloadable computer programs for use with transportation robots for conveying vehicles and robots for use in industry; Downloadable computer software for use with transportation robots for conveying vehicles and robots for use in industry; Electric sensors; Electronic apparatus for the remote control of industrial operations; GPS navigation device; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in scientific research; Laboratory robots; Liquid crystal displays; Motion sensors; Radar apparatus; Recorded computer software for database management; Security surveillance robots; Sensors for measuring distance, not for medical use; Sensors for determining position; Simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; Teaching robots; Telepresence robots; Video transmission apparatus | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2022 |
| 012 | Drones; Tires; Air vehicles for transport; Driverless cars; Electrically-powered motor vehicles; Goods handling carts; Land vehicles; Remotely controlled land vehicle; Delivery drones | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |