USPTO serial 97751354
MIHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'NEILL, MARY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hersham, Surrey, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro SHAPIRO AND SILVERSTEIN PLLC1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment, namely computer hardware, recorded software, sensors, RFID readers, RFID tags, RFID antennas, location trackers and GPS tracking devices for connecting, operating, and managing networked doors, gates and flaps for pets, feeders for pets, and watering devices for pets connected to the Internet of Things; downloadable computer software for connecting, operating, and managing networked doors, gates and flaps for pets, feeders for pets, and watering devices for pets connected to the Internet of Things; downloadable mobile phone applications for enabling connection, operation, and management of networked doors, gates and flaps for pets, feeders for pets, and watering devices for pets connected to the Internet of Things | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, data transmission and reception services, between a user and doors, gates and flaps for pets, feeders for pets, and watering devices for pets via the Internet of Things | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connecting, operating, and managing networked doors, gates and flaps for pets, feeders for pets, and watering devices for pets via the Internet of Things | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2024 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |