Drawing for AEROLIGHT

USPTO serial 97752973

AEROLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FORREST, ELIZABETH P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEROLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jenifer deWolf Paine

Jenifer deWolf Paine Fish & Richardson P.C.PO Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Dehumidifiers; Electric fans; LED luminaires; Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; Lighting fixtures; Lights for use in growing plants; Ultrasonic sterilizers for household purposes; Ventilation fan accessories, namely, grilles; Ventilation hoods; Desk lamps; Electric lamps; Electric lighting fixtures, namely, sconces; Halogen lamps; Light Emitting Diode (LED) plant grow light; Sun lampsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2026MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 15, 2026ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 14, 2026EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 10, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 28, 2024KSNSNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW—
May 28, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 3, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance