USPTO serial 97753926
ARGUS 3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, MARISSA SHARPE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGUS 3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Maier
Timothy J. Maier MAIER & MAIER, PLLC345 SOUTH PATRICK ST.ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LED television monitors; Virtual training simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Military training simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Simulator electronic display screens and flat panel display screens for flight, vehicle drive training, electronic firearms training, electronic sports training simulators; Helicopter simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Aircraft simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Naval vessel simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Firearm simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Missile simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Simulator display apparatus for military maneuvers in the nature of electronic display boards; Rocket simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Satellite simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Museum simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; Entertainment simulator display apparatus in the nature of electronic display boards; LED displays; LED video displays; LED video walls being light emitting diode displays; LED video wall displays; LED video screens; Indoor LED video displays; Outdoor LED video displays; Indoor LED video walls being light emitting diode displays; Outdoor LED video walls being light emitting diode displays; Indoor LED Video Screens; Outdoor LED Video Screens; Video screens in the nature of electronic LED video signs; Video screens in the nature of indoor electronic LED video signs; Video screens in the nature of outdoor electronic LED video signs; LED video boards being light emitting diode displays; Indoor LED video boards being light emitting diode displays; Outdoor LED video boards being light emitting diode displays; Light emitting diode displays in the nature of electronic LED signs; Light emitting diode displays in the nature of LED video screens; LED walls being light emitting diode displays; LED boards being light emitting diode displays; Transparent LED video walls being light emitting diode displays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |