USPTO serial 97759148
MANSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAGIT, JACOB FLEMING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Olosky, Registration No. 53,411
Patricia A. Olosky, Registration No. 53,411 THE WEBB LAW FIRMONE GATEWAY CENTER420 FORT DUQUESNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Amusement arcade services; gaming services in the nature of casino gaming, namely, blackjack, keno, craps, roulette, poker, slot machines, pontoon, boule, baccarat, punto banco, chemin defer, mini-dice, fan tan, sic bo, pal gow, pal gow poker, lucky wheel, casino war, red dog; providing facilities for the use of video poker machines; providing recreational facilities, namely, swimming pools, gymnasium, health clubs, exercise clubs and exercise facilities; planning sports competitions; booking of seats for shows; providing sports facilities; planning, arranging and conducting of sports competitions; off track betting services; bingo hall services; providing on-line electronic non-downloadable publications in the nature of books and journals in the field of sports events results, news events, offers of bets, and betting odds; publication of on-line publications, namely, electronic books and journals; providing non-downloadable on-line games; and provision of online computer games by means of a computer based system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |