USPTO serial 97761312
THE BRAND STEAKHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BRAND STEAKHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christian Sanchelima, Esq.
CHRISTIAN SANCHELIMA, ESQ. SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.235 SW LE JEUNE ROADMIAMI, FL 33134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Footwear; Gloves; Scarfs; Togas; Underclothes; Veils; Bottoms as clothing; Paper hats for use as clothing items; Tops as clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Beef; Butter; Caviar; Cheese; Cream; Jams; Margarine; Milk; Pork; Poultry; Sausages; Almond milk; Canned fruits; Cheese spreads; Clams, not live; Crab meat; Crabs, not live; Dried fruit-based snacks; Edible oil, namely, nut oil, sunflower oil, peanut oil, coconut oil, olive oil.; Fish, not live; Frozen fruits; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit spreads; Game; Lobsters, not live; Milk-based beverages with chocolate; Non-dairy milk substitutes; Nut-based snack foods; Nut-based spreads; Nut butters; Nut butters, namely, almond butter; Nut oils for food; Olives, preserved; Peanut butter; Potato crisps and chips; Preserved olives; Processed coconut; Processed vegetables and fruits; Processed, edible seaweed; Sardines, not live; Sausage meat; Vegetables, preserved | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bread; Buns; Cakes; Candy; Caramels; Chocolate; Cinnamon; Cocoa; Coffee; Cookies; Custard; Dough; Flour; Noodles; Pastries; Pies; Rice; Tarts; Tea; Waffles; Yeast; Bread crumbs; Bread rolls; Cake batter; Cake dough; Cake frosting; Cake mixes; Candy decorations for cakes; Cereal-based snack food; Cheeseburger sandwiches; Chocolate mousses; Chocolate-based beverages; Chocolate-based beverages with milk; Cocoa beverages with milk; Cocoa-based beverages; Coffee beverages with milk; Coffee drinks; Coffee based beverages; Confectionery made of sugar; Crushed oats; Dessert mousse; Pastries, namely, pasties; Rice cakes; Rice pudding; Rice-based snack food; Tea-based beverages; Tortilla chips; Unleavened bread; Wheat germ for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Lemonades; Smoothies; Aerated water; Fruit juice; Fruit juice beverages; Fruit nectars; Ginger ale; Ginger beer; Mineral water; Non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic flavored carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Soda water; Tomato juice beverages; Vegetable juice; Water beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Hotel accommodation and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Humo, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Humo, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE BRAND STEAKHOUSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |