USPTO serial 97762633
ORLANDO SQUEEZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAUCETTE, MAX CLIFFORD STE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORLANDO SQUEEZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Staci R. DeRegnaucourt
Staci R. DeRegnaucourt VARNUM LLP101 NORTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 525ANN ARBOR, MI 48104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stickers; decals; publications and printed matter, namely, printed pickleball trading cards other than for games, paper tickets for pickleball games and events, printed event programs related to pickleball, printed sports programs related to pickleball, paper coasters, paper banners and flags, unmounted and mounted printed photographs, printed posters, printed calendars, and printed bumper stickers; printed magazines in the field of pickleball; printed catalogs in the field of pickleball; printed commemorative game and souvenir programs related to pickleball; paper pennants, printed stationery, printed post cards, printed invitation cards, printed certificates, printed greeting cards, printed informational statistical sheets for pickleball topics; printed newsletters, brochures, pamphlets, and game schedules in the field of pickleball, all of the foregoing exclusively related to pickleball and sports teams in the field of pickleball | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |