USPTO serial 97763210
AMD SMART ACCESS MEMORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 807Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOLANO, CARLITA JAYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AMD SMART ACCESS MEMORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Belinda J. Scrimenti
Belinda J. Scrimenti WILKINSON BARKER KNAUER, LLP1800 M STREET NW, SUITE 800NWASHINGTON, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | semiconductor chips; semiconductor devices; semiconductors; accelerated video processors; central processing unit (CPU); central processing unit (CPU) cores; graphics processing unit (GPU); graphics processing unit (GPU) cores; graphics accelerators; graphics cards; graphics processors; video display cards; video graphics accelerator; video graphics processors; microprocessors; microprocessor modules; integrated circuits, namely, graphics, video and multimedia integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips; cards containing integrated circuits; computer graphic chipsets; computer hardware; computer hardware for enhancing and providing real-time transfer, transmission, reception, processing and digitizing of audio and video graphics information; computer hardware subsystems comprised of microprocessor subsystems; microprocessor subsystems comprised of one or more microprocessors, central processing unit (CPU), CPU cores being microprocessors, and downloadable and recorded software for operating the foregoing; graphics processor subsystem, namely, microprocessor subsystems comprised of one or more microprocessors, graphics processing units (GPUs), GPU cores being microprocessors, and downloadable and recorded software for operating the foregoing; system on a chip (SOC) architecture for use with CPUs and graphics processing units (GPUs), namely, SOC architecture being computer hardware and recorded and downloadable software that connects die-to-die, chip-to-chip, and socket-to-socket, used across different microprocessors to enable increased computing performance; semiconductor memories; integrated circuit memories, namely, integrated circuit computer memories and integrated circuit semiconductor memories; microprocessor communication memory, namely, random access memory (RAM) and video random access memory (VRAM) memory shared by a central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU); downloadable software for operating all of the foregoing; downloadable computer operating system software; recorded processor operating software; downloadable processor operating software; recorded computer software for operating microprocessors; downloadable computer software for operating microprocessors; recorded computer software for rendering digital graphics and video games; downloadable computer software for rendering digital graphics and video games; recorded computer graphics rendering software; downloadable graphics rendering software; downloadable video game software; recorded basic input/output system (BIOS) software; downloadable basic input/output system (BIOS) software; recorded basic input/output system (BIOS) computer programs; downloadable basic input/output system (BIOS) computer programs; recorded computer software, namely, software that increases processing capabilities and performance of graphics processing unit (GPU) video random access memory (VRAM) by transferring data directly between computer processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs); downloadable computer software, namely, software that increases processing capabilities and performance of graphics processing unit (GPU) video random access memory (VRAM) by transferring data directly between computer processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs) | ACTIVE | May 10, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |