USPTO serial 97773726
D' NATURAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D' NATURAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kabupaten Sidoarjo, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph G. Chu
Joseph G. Chu JCIPCENTURY SQUARE155 N. LAKE AVENUE, SUITE 800PASADENA, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Soy sauces; ketchup; bread; sandwiches; biscuits; ice cream cakes; ice cream; frozen yogurts; edible ices; frozen yogurt, namely, confectionery ices; dry biscuits; sorbet; bakery products; cookies; cakes; spring roll; seasoning pastes for flavoring of cakes; tea-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate based beverages with milk; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based; coffee; coffee flavored bakery desserts; curry paste; honey; fruit flavored ice cream bars; iced tea; mayonnaise; noodles; noodle-based prepared meals; soya bean paste; tarts; dessert puddings; Petit-beurre biscuits; pesto sauce; rice-based snack food; tomato ketchup; cooking sauces; seasonings; sherbet; cheeseburger sandwiches; aniseed for use as a flavoring in food and drinks; seasonings made of fruits; cinnamon powder used as spice; cloves; clove powder used as spice; cooking salt; ground nutmeg spice; pepper spice; pimiento used as a condiment; salt; spices; preserved herbs as seasonings; table salt; candy for food; fruit flavored drops used as confectionery, namely, drop-shaped jelly confectionery; natural sweeteners; tapioca flour; tapioca-based snacks; tapioca; mixes in the nature of powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages; tea; green tea; sauces for cooking foodstuffs; turmeric for food; unleavened bread; starch noodles; vermicelli; vinegars; waffles; spices made of berries; flavored ingredients for food, namely, cinnamon; artificial coffee; baking powder; processed grains, namely, crushed millet; processed grains, namely, peeled millet; barley meal; nut flours; beer vinegar; coffee based drink; chocolate based drink; flavorings, other than essential oils, for cakes; food leavening agents; starch-based binding agents for ice cream; gingerbread; breadcrumbs; currant bread; cake mixes; rice-based cakes; candies; caramels; celery salt; processed grains; coffee substitutes; chocolates; chocolate powder; coffee beverages with milk; coffee flavorings for beverages not being essential oils; dried herbs; unroasted coffee; corn flour; maize milled; popcorn; roasted corn; tartar sauce; cream of tartar for culinary purposes; dessert puddings made of eggs, milk and sugar; dressings for salad; yeast for use as an ingredient in foods; flavorings for beverages, other than essential oils; prepared coffee based beverages; all of the foregoing being natural food products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |