USPTO serial 97778881
WINEFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARREDA, AMBER KYLEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINEFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Scappoose, OR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable audio and video recordings featuring artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); digital media, namely, downloadable digital collectibles in the nature of image files and metadata, digital files containing image files and metadata, cryptographic tokens featuring images files and metadata, non-fungible tokens (nfts) featuring image files and metadata, cryptocurrency and digital art in the nature of image files and meatadata authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) ; Downloadable augmented reality software for accessing and displaying digital collectibles, digital tokens, cryptographic tokens, non-fungible tokens (nfts), cryptocurrency and digital art; Downloadable image files containing artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork relating to wine, namely, wine bottles, wine labels, wine ingredients, wine vintage, and wine producer authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, and video relating to wine, namely, wine bottles, wine labels, wine ingredients, wine vintage, and wine producer authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, video, games, and Internet webpage links relating to wine, namely, wine bottles, wine labels, wine ingredients, wine vintage, and wine producer authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing audio relating to wine, namely, wine bottles, wine labels, wine ingredients, wine vintage, and wine producer authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing text relating to wine, namely, wine bottles, wine labels, wine ingredients, wine vintage, and wine producer authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing video relating to wine, namely, wine bottles, wine labels, wine ingredients, wine vintage, and wine producer authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable video recordings featuring artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Radio frequency identification (RFID) labels; Radio frequency identification (RFID) stickers; Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of downloadable digital art images authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of wines and spirits authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Authentication in the field of wine; Authentication of data in the field of wine using blockchain technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Farrell, Sean E
- Other trademarks owned by Heck, Kevin A
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WINEFT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |