Drawing for BOBIDI

USPTO serial 97779536

BOBIDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOBIDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rajesh Fotedar

Rajesh Fotedar COGNITION IP P.C.50 CALIFORNIA ST., SUITE 1500SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Use in Commerce) Downloadable mobile software applications for capturing artificial intelligence test data; Downloadable mobile software applications for editing photographic images; Downloadable mobile software applications for chat messaging; Downloadable mobile software applications for simulating conversations via chatbots; Downloadable mobile software applications for making digital voice recordings; Downloadable mobile software applications for evaluating audio quality of digital audio; Downloadable mobile software applications for providing users with digital rewards; Downloadable mobile software applications for providing users with digital rewards in exchange for providing user activity data; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for capturing artificial intelligence test data; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for editing photographic images; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for chat messaging; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for simulating conversations via chatbots; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for making digital voice recordings; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for evaluating audio quality of digital audio; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for providing users with digital rewards; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for providing users with digital rewards in exchange for providing user activity dataACTIVEDec 25, 2021
042(Based on Intent To Use) Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing access to artificial intelligence test data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for validating artificial intelligence system data; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for accessing artificial intelligence test data; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for validating artificial intelligence system data; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for providing access to artificial intelligence test data; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for validating artificial intelligence system dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 4, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 27, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2023MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance