Drawing for CTI TELE-TRANSITIONS COACH

USPTO serial 97779613

CTI TELE-TRANSITIONS COACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUEKEN, ABIGAIL JOSEPHINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CTI TELE-TRANSITIONS COACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger D. Emerson, Esq.

Roger D. Emerson, Esq. EMERSON THOMSON BENNETT1914 AKRON-PENINSULA ROADAKRON, OH 44313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for simultaneously allowing a non-doctor healthcare professional to video conference with a healthcare patient and add information to the patient's health recordsACTIVE—
035Public policy consulting in the field of health care in the nature of providing data regarding patient needs, monitoring and updating real-time analytics regarding successful outcomes, and providing data linking individual and population metrics, in order to assist decision makers in making public policy and health care policy decisions to ensure continued patient access to care during transitions across different care settingsACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for simultaneously allowing a non-doctor healthcare professional to video conference with a healthcare patient and add information to the patient's health recordsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 24, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2023RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Apr 6, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance