USPTO serial 97782454
ENTANGLEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 732Notice of Allowance
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
Need help with ENTANGLEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Notice of Allowance, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $349*
Plus Government fees of $150
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tyler E. Baker
Tyler E. Baker SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP20 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer technology consulting and technology information services in the fields of next-generation ("next-gen") computing, high-performance computing (HPC) utilizing high-performance computing architectures, artificial intelligence, predictive computing, quantum bridging solutions, and machine learning; Consulting services in the field of next-gen computing, high-performance computing (HPC) utilizing high-performance computing architectures, predictive computing, and artificial intelligence; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for programming, optimizing, and running software on high-performance computing (HPC) architectures; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for utilizing next-gen computing, high-performance computing (HPC), predictive computing, quantum-bridging solutions, artificial intelligence, and machine learning in applications; Research and development and consultation in the fields of next-gen computing, high-performance computing (HPC) utilizing high-performance computing architectures, artificial intelligence, predictive computing, quantum-bridging solutions, and machine learning; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of software systems for others; Design and development of computer software for others in the field of business intelligence, research and logistics using high-performance computing (HPC) architectures; Development and design of computing software and applications utilizing high-performance computing (HPC) architectures; Research, design and development of software and computer software platforms utilizing and for predictive computing, next-gen computing, and high-performance computing on high-performance computing architectures; Design, development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software relating to predictive computing, next-gen computing, high-performance computing, predictive computing, artificial intelligence, and machine learning on high-performance computing architectures; Research, design, development and analysis of computer environments in the fields of predictive computing, next-gen computing, high-performance computing, artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning; Computer programming and software design relating to predictive computing, next-gen computing, high-performance computing on high-performance computing architectures; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design relating thereto relating to predictive computing, next-gen computing, high-performance computing on high-performance computing architectures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2026 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |