Drawing for BIG BORE

USPTO serial 97785157

BIG BORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAVEN, PAUL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG BORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan K. Wheelock

Bryan K. Wheelock HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400ST, LOUIS, MO 63105United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013AmmunitionACTIVEMar 16, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2024AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 18, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2023AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2023IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2023AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 6, 2023IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 5, 2023EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2023MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance