USPTO serial 97789985
MLABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MLABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin W. Janke
201 ST. CHARLES AVE., SUITE 3600NEW ORLEANS, LA 70170UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | IT integration services; computer systems integration services; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; technological consulting services for digital transformation; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) cloud computing systems of others; technological planning and consulting services in the field of digital innovation, digital systems integration, digital applications, cloud native computing, hybrid multicloud computing, edge computing, software-defined data center solutions, platform operations, artificial intelligence, and zero trust security; engineering services in the field of digital systems integration and enterprise IT; engineering services in the field of cloud computing; digital engineering; cloud and data center engineering; full-stack engineering; technology advisory services related to digital innovation, digital systems integration, digital applications, cloud native computing, hybrid multicloud computing, edge computing, software-defined data center solutions, platform operations, artificial intelligence, and zero trust security; planning, design and management of information technology systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |