USPTO serial 97797624
W F
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 672
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUEKEN, ABIGAIL JOSEPHINE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with W F?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim J. Billick
Tim J. Billick Practus LLP600 1st AveSte 102Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for use in the automation of business tasks, business processes technologies and business operations of others | ACTIVE | May 18, 2018 |
| 042 | Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of business process automation technology using artificial intelligence; business task automation for offices and workplaces using artificial intelligence tools for the automation of manual processes and tasks; Developing customized software in the field of automation of business tasks, machine learning, business process technologies and business operations for others; Research and development of computer software; Software design and development; Software development and product development consulting in the field of automation of manual processes and tasks.; Technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software customization | ACTIVE | May 18, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2025 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| May 5, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2024 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |