USPTO serial 97806429
L'ACCENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 643
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUEKEN, ABIGAIL JOSEPHINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L'ACCENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenny T. Slocum
Jenny T. Slocum DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC1825 EYE STREET N.W., SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal composite decking, decking components and fixtures and supports, namely, composite and wood decking; fences not of metal, non-metal fencing panels and fencing gates; pergolas not primarily of metal; non-metal partitions for building; pavers; paver tiles; paver stones; non-metal railings for decks and stairs; non-metal stairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |