USPTO serial 97808375
TECH7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAGIT, JACOB FLEMING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECH7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Martensen
Michael C. Martensen MARTENSEN IP30 EAST KIOWA STREET SUITE 101COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering design services; Engineering services, namely, engineering and computer systems integration services for deployment of operational capabilities onto department of defense and intelligence community operations centers; scientific research and development services; engineering services in the nature of custom design of prototypes; agile software engineering services in the nature of computer system design using agile development methods; Software engineering services in the field of data science, data engineering, and data exploitation science; computer software development services; physics-based computer modeling services and simulation to develop data sets used for training artificial intelligence and software development; all of the aforementioned exclusive of commercial information technology consulting and directed to and exclusively operating in the government defense agencies channels of commerce. | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |