USPTO serial 97813089
QUADVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUADVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Menkes
Jonathan A. Menkes KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded vision testing computer software, namely, downloadable and recorded computer software for testing for optical aberrations and optical disorders, diagnosing or aiding a practitioner in diagnosing optical aberrations and optical disorders, and determining corrective prescriptions and corrective surgery; downloadable and recorded software as a medical device for vision testing, namely, downloadable and recorded software as a medical device for testing for optical aberrations and optical disorders, diagnosing or aiding a practitioner in optical aberrations and optical disorders, and determining corrective prescriptions and corrective surgery; downloadable and recorded computer software for displaying differing optical corrections, namely, downloadable and recorded computer software for digitally displaying differing corrective image data using light field technology to determine or aid a practitioner in determining corrective prescriptions or corrective surgery for a patient; subjective refractors for testing visual acuity; remotely operated subjective refractors for testing visual acuity | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Vision testing devices, namely, subjective refractors and phoropters for testing for optical aberrations and optical disorders, diagnosing or aiding a practitioner in diagnosing optical aberrations and optical disorders, and determining corrective prescriptions and corrective surgery; vision testing devices implementing digital vision testing, namely, subjective refractors and phoropters using light field technology to display differing corrective image data to determine or aid a practitioner in determining corrective prescriptions or corrective surgery for a patient | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring vision-based testing devices connected to a network to permit a practitioner to remotely access the device to provide health care and clinical services via the network-connected vision-based and light-based diagnostic and corrective device | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Provision of optometry and optometric services via network-connected vision-testing devices; providing a website featuring information on optometry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |