USPTO serial 97815552
C TWO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHMIELARSKI, ANDREW J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C TWO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dianne M. Smith-Misemer
Dianne M. Smith-Misemer HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing online forums; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users; Providing online forums for communication in the field of automation, computer software, and work management best practices and trends; Providing online forums, namely, managing an online forum for discussion of computer software; Providing online forums, namely, hosting an online forum for users to discuss and exchange computer software; all of the foregoing excluding software for email management, email signatures, mail-box and data migration, data backup and web surveys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C TWO AUTOMATE AS
- Other trademarks owned by RPA Supervisor AS
- Other trademarks owned by C TWO AUTOMATE AS
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named C TWO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2025 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |