USPTO serial 97818204
CITY ADAPTABILITY INDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 612
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITY ADAPTABILITY INDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Lhota
David P. Lhota LHOTA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.500 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARDSUITE 1710FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33394Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Charging of electrical vehicles; Custom building construction of enclosures; community planning, namely, planning and laying out residential communities; stormwater management services, namely, installation, maintenance, and repair of stormwater management facilities equipment | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 2023 |
| 042 | Engineering and engineering consulting services, namely, civil engineering, electrical engineering, and environmental engineering; geospatial and land surveying; mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP) engineering; restoration engineering; engineering services in the field of stormwater management; structural engineering; subsurface utility engineering; traffic engineering; transportation engineering; utilities engineering; civil engineering relating to water and wastewater; architectural services; sustainable urban planning services; engineering services in the field of parking spaces; engineering services in the field of parking lots | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |