USPTO serial 97820190
KIDSKONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIDSKONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney LEE & HAYES, PC601 W. RIVERSIDE AVE SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable educational course materials in the field of children's education; Downloadable computer software concerned with children's education; downloadable Virtual reality software for education; downloadable augmented reality software for education; Downloadable educational mobile applications in the field of children's education; Downloadable educational media, namely, audio files, video recordings and multimedia files, featuring children's education; downloadable educational software in the field of children's education; Downloadable computer software for customer relation management; Downloadable computer software for teaching; Downloadable Computer software for monitoring the use of computers and the internet by children; Downloadable software for children's education; Downloadable communication software for connecting computer network users; Downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; All of the aforementioned goods only within the field of childcare and education | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online forums; Electronic communication by means of chatrooms, chat lines and internet forums; Video broadcasting; Videoconference services; Video messaging services; Electronic message delivery services; telecommunication services, namely, voice transmission services; wireless electronic transmission of images | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Programming of educational software; Software as a service, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in database management; Platform as a service featuring computer software platforms for use in database management; All of the aforementioned services only within the field of childcare and education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |