Drawing for LAW BETTER

USPTO serial 97828739

LAW BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAW BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Apel

Brian Apel BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.71 SOUTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Managed document review services, namely, business management of electronic processing of information; business project management services; project management services for others in the fields of language translationACTIVE—
042Non-downloadable software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for e-discovery for the legal community; non-downloadable software as a service for managing third party documents and electronically stored information; providing online non-downloadable software for litigation case management; computer forensic services; computer system and software integration and technical consulting for multiple systems and networks; online web-hosting facilities for others for sharing online content; server hosting; computer project management servicesACTIVE—
045Legal consulting services; litigation support services, namely, electronic legal discovery services; legal managed document review services for others; litigation support services; legal project management services, namely providing case management services for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2024ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 25, 2024PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 11, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 12, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance