Drawing for MEGAFORCE SENTINEL

USPTO serial 97828911

MEGAFORCE SENTINEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MEGAFORCE SENTINEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly M. Maynard

Kimberly M. Maynard FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC28 LIBERTY STREETNEW YORK, NY 10005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, storytelling, interactive storytelling, and storytelling through the use of puzzles and games; entertainment services, namely, the provision of online non-downloadable puzzles and electronic gamesACTIVEApr 5, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2024CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2024SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 13, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2024IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 12, 2024EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 12, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance