USPTO serial 97829658
INSTACART CARROT AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTACART CARROT AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Greenwald-Swire
Lisa Greenwald-Swire FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that allows users to search, browse, and purchase a wide variety of consumer goods of others; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for browsing, comparing, and purchasing a wide variety of consumer goods of others; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for ordering delivery services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for engaging and coordinating personal shopper and delivery services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing information on available same-day transportation and delivery services; providing a website featuring technology that allows users to search, access, create, publish and browse information in the field of food, cooking, wine, beverages, recipes, general merchandise, consumer goods, pharmacy goods, home goods, pet supplies, electronics, clothing, beauty products, media, and office supplies; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for shopping in the field of consumer goods, grocery, food, pharmacy, home goods, pet supply, electronics, clothing, beauty, media, office supply, and general merchandise; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for delivery in the field of consumer goods, grocery, food, pharmacy, home goods, pet supply, electronics, clothing, beauty, media, office supply, and general merchandise; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for searching for and accessing, creating, publishing, and browsing recipes and information in the field of food, cooking, wine, and beverages; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for searching for and accessing, creating, publishing and browsing information in the field of general merchandise, consumer goods, groceries and food, pharmacy goods, home goods, pet supplies, electronics, clothing, beauty products, media, office supplies; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for replying to questions from online retail store customers; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for generating contextual recommendations; all of the foregoing excluding photo and video sharing and social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |