USPTO serial 97830217
ICS360.DEFENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICS360.DEFENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ann Arbor, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Staci R. DeRegnaucourt
Staci R. DeRegnaucourt Varnum LLP101 North Main Street, Suite 525Ann Arbor, MI 48104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technology advisory consultation services related to industrial control systems in the nature of control systems and associated electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used to operate and/or automate industrial processes; Consultation in the field of remote monitoring of the functioning and use of industrial control systems in the nature of control systems and associated electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used to operate and/or automate industrial processes; Measurement evaluations in the field of industrial control systems in the nature of control systems and associated electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used to operate and/or automate industrial processes; Technical support and consultation services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with industrial control systems used to operate and/or automate industrial processes; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for maintenance, upgrades, updates, remote diagnostic troubleshooting, remote data monitoring, remote health assessments of industrial control systems used to operate and/or automate industrial processes; Computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of industrial control systems; computer security threat analysis for protecting data in the field of industrial control systems; cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to industrial control systems; maintenance of computer software relating to computer security in the field of industrial control systems; providing temporary use of a non-downloadable web application for managed cyber security for industrial control systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the detection, analysis, mitigation and resolution of threats in the field of industrial control systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |