Drawing for X

USPTO serial 97830806

X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SENSOR, JAMES EARL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ron N. Dreben

Ron N. Dreben MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NWATTENTION: TMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable cloud-based software for automated code review analysisACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software for automated code review and analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring cloud computing software for use in inventory management, resource management, budget projection, cost management, and data management; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Providing online non-downloadable database management software for use in the field of staffing; Providing online non-downloadable computer database management software for use in personalizing the content of e-mail communications; Providing online non-downloadable enterprise software in the nature of a database for non-transactional dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2024NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2024DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 1, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 31, 2024DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2024ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 1, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2023ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 19, 2023PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 7, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance