USPTO serial 97834128
MTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timur Slonim
Timur Slonim Law Office of Timur E. Slonim, Esq.86 Reno AveStaten Island, NY 10306United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engine mounts, other than for land vehicles; Mounting brackets adapted for exhaust systems for internal combustion engines; Mounting fasteners adapted for exhaust systems for internal combustion engines; Mounting hangers adapted for exhaust systems for internal combustion engines; Air filters for automobile engines; Air filters for vehicle motors and engines; Automobile oil pans; Exhaust pipes for land vehicles; Radiators for vehicles; Water pumps for land vehicles; Windshield wiper motors for marine or land vehicles | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1997 |
| 012 | ATVs (all terrain vehicles); Engine mounts for land vehicles; Structural parts for automobiles; Structural parts for boats; Structural parts for buses; Structural parts for motorcycles; Structural parts for trucks; Structural parts for vans; Vehicle brake pads; Vehicle bumpers; Vehicle parts, namely, ball joints; Vehicle parts, namely, constant velocity joints; Vehicle parts, namely, idler arms; Vehicle parts, namely, shock absorbers; Vehicle parts, namely, steering wheels; Vehicle parts, namely, sun visors; Vehicle parts, namely, suspension struts; Vehicle parts, namely, transfer cases; Vehicle parts, namely, windshield wipers; Automobiles and structural parts therefor; Automotive engine mounts; Axle boot kits for use with land vehicles; Brake pads for vehicles; Brake pads for land vehicles; Gears for vehicles; Land vehicle structural parts for automobiles, ATV's, motorcycles, buses, and tractors; Land vehicles and structural parts therefor; Lug bolts for vehicle wheels; Motorcycles and structural parts therefor; Mud flaps for vehicles; Steering knuckles; Steering and suspension systems and parts for steering and suspension systems for vehicles, namely, upper ball joints, lower ball joints, ball joints with control arms, bushing kits, inner tie rod ends, outer tie rod ends, sleeves, idler arms, center links, stabilizer kits, inner sockets and pitman arms; Steering boot kits for use with land vehicles; Structural repair parts for trucks, trailers, and other motor vehicles; Transmission mounting plates for land vehicles; Utility hitch trailers designed for use in automobiles, ATV's, motorcycles, buses, and tractors used for hauling lumber, towing ATVs, transporting harvested fruit; Vehicle parts, namely, power steering hoses | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |