USPTO serial 97845831
VIKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, TRAVIS WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole M Bulman
Nicole M Bulman von Briesen & Roper, s.c.320 South Canal Street Suite 3025CHICAGO, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |