USPTO serial 97846252
B FAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B FAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lynn Haven, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; Blush; Cosmetics; Bath fizzies; Bath gel; Bath gels; Bath oil; Bath oils; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Bath salts, not for medical purposes; Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Blush pencils; Blusher; Body glitter; Body glitters; Body lotion; Body lotion bars; Body lotions; Body scrub; Body scrubs; Body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; Body sprays; Body sprays, namely, water in atomized containers used to produce a cooling effect; Body mask lotion; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Cosmetics in the form of milks, lotions and emulsions; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; Eye-shadow; Eye shadow; Eye shadows; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, hair detangler, hair conditioner; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioner bars; Hair conditioners; Hair conditioners for hair conditioner, hair detangler; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair weave conditioners; Hair weave shampoos; Hair weave shampoo-conditioners; Lip gloss; Lip gloss and wands therefor sold as a unit; Lip gloss palette; Lip glosses; Lotions for face and body care; Oil baths for hair care; Aromatic oils for the bath; Aromatic preparations, namely, perfume, body spray, spritzer; Bar soap; Beauty care cosmetics; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Compacts sold filled with cosmetics; Cosmetic bath salts; Cosmetic body scrubs for the soap, body spray, lotion, body scrub; Cosmetic body care preparations, namely, soap, body spray, lotion, body scrub; Eyebrow cosmetics; Face and body glitter; Face and body lotions; Fragranced body care preparations, namely, soap, body spray, lotion, body scrub; Leave-in hair conditioners; Make-up kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss; Make-up palettes containing cosmetics; Mineral salt in the nature of bath salts not for medical purposes; Moisturizing body lotions; Nail cosmetics; Natural cosmetics; Non-medicated bath salts; Non-medicated bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Non-medicated hair shampoos for hair shampoo; Non-medicated lotions for body lotion, face lotion; Non-medicated shampoos for hair shampoo; Organic cosmetics; Perfumed soap; Private label cosmetics; Scented body lotions and creams; Scented body spray; Shower and bath gel; Skin soap; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin moisturizers used as cosmetics; Toiletry bags sold filled with non-medicated toiletry preparations, namely, hair detangler, hair conditioner | ACTIVE | May 5, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |