USPTO serial 97846458
WAREHOUSE BRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFITHS, SYDNEY V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WAREHOUSE BRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Belinda J. Scrimenti
Belinda J. Scrimenti WILKINSON BARKER KNAUER, LLP1800 M STREET NW, SUITE 800NWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | temporary use, non-downloadable software, software as a service (SAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS), in the nature of adaptive software development (ASD) software that dynamically orchestrates decision-making and decision support for warehouse resource planning and for use with and optimization of warehouse management systems; temporary use, non-downloadable software, software as a service (SAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS), all based on artificial intelligence and machine learning for integration with warehouse management systems, for warehouse optimization, and for scheduling; temporary use, non-downloadable software, software as a service (SAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS) for preparing warehouse management system analytics and reports of data impacting warehouse efficiency, namely, analytics and reports of data relating to incoming and outbound shipments, inventory needed, planned ship time, receipts, and arrival time, SKU attributes of inventory status, weight, dimensions and locations, shipment location attributes of size, available capacity, and current capacity status, availability of robotic systems or material handling equipment, labor capacity attributes of skill sets and capability, available personnel capacity, rate work, location, dependencies, constraints, and time scheduling, and shipment processes attributes of routings, sequences and dependencies; temporary use, non-downloadable software, software as a service (SAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS) consisting of e-books and case studies related to the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |