USPTO serial 97847575
GLAMOUR LOCKS HAIR EXTENSION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURDECKI, ANNA C
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLAMOUR LOCKS HAIR EXTENSION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica Martinez
Monica Martinez LZ LEGAL SERVICES, LLC101 N. BRAND BLVD, 11TH FLOORGLENDALE, CA 91203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Hair salon services, namely, hair cutting, styling, coloring, and hair extension services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2024 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |