USPTO serial 97851338
CARSCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEICHTER, KENNETH HOWARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARSCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B. GARRED
MARK B. GARRED STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISESUITE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Automobile diagnostic services provided on-line, via a computer network and by telephone | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |