USPTO serial 97853099
M MTS US
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EMILO, LORI ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M MTS US?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olga Zalomiy
Olga Zalomiy LAW OFFICES OF OLGA ZALOMIY, PC11400 W. OLYMPIC BLVD., STE. 200LOS ANGELES, CA 90064United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Training in the field of health, beauty, skin care and cosmetics; educational services, namely, providing conferences, seminars and workshops in the field of health, beauty, skin care and cosmetics; arranging and conducting educational demonstrations and exhibitions in the field of health, beauty, skin care and cosmetics; educational services, namely, training in the field of beauty and skin treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty analysis to determine cosmetics that are best suited to particular individuals; Beauty care consultancy; Beauty consultancy; Beauty consultation services in the selection and use of cosmetics, beauty aids, personal care products; beauty counseling; Wellness and health-related consulting; Online cosmetic skincare consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 7, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |