USPTO serial 97855872
YOYU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOYU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara L. Onofrio
Dara L. Onofrio ONOFRIO LAW24 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 329CLINTON, CT 06413United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Tempura seafood; tempura vegetables; prepared and packaged Asian meals consisting primarily of beef, pork, chicken, fish, cheeses, vegetables, or fruits; Japanese fried chicken | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chinese stuffed dumplings being xiaolongbao or baozi; Japanese dumplings being gyoza; Pad Thai; ramen noodles; udon noodles; soup dumplings; flour-based dumplings stuffed with meat, fish, chicken, shrimp, vegetables, or fruits; rice dumplings stuffed with meat, fish, chicken, shrimp, vegetables, or fruits; Asian noodles; donburi or rice bowls consisting of beef, pork, chicken, fish, cheeses, vegetables, or fruits; noodle bowls consisting of noodles with beef, pork, chicken, fish, cheeses, vegetables, or fruits; ramen, udon, or soba bowls consisting of broth, noodles, beef, pork chicken, fish cheeses, vegetables, or fruits; | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |