USPTO serial 97857878
SPOTWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPOTWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Atkins
Michael G. Atkins ATKINS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PLLC113 CHERRY STREET #18483SEATTLE, WA 98104-2205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic inspection devices for the detection of defects in welding incorporated in sheet metal products designed to be used in the field of non-destructive testing applications; electronic inspection devices for the detection of defects in welding incorporated in sheet metal products in connection with inspection systems using field-programmable gate array technology, phased array technology, ultrasound technology, eddy current technology, and other nondestructive signals and currents; electronic inspection devices to detect defects in welding incorporated in sheet metal products using ultrasounds, monoprobes, multi-probes, phase network probes, or eddy current probes; electronic inspection devices designed for high-speed ultrasound inspections, all of the foregoing used to inspect the integrity of welding incorporated in sheet metal products; electronic enclosures, ultrasound probes not for medical use, sensor chips and Ultrasonic sensors, all designed to be used for non-destructive testing applications, all of the foregoing used to inspect the integrity of welding; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling the distribution or use of electricity namely controllers, remote microprocessors, sensors, detectors to identify defects in welding incorporated in sheet metal products and transducers; ultrasonic transmission devices machines, namely transducers, all of the foregoing used to inspect the integrity of welding incorporated in sheet metal products; calculating machines, data processing equipment, computers, downloadable and embedded software for non-destructive testing inspections and signal image processing, all of the foregoing used to inspect the integrity of welding incorporated in sheet metal products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services relating to the non-destructive testing field; development of computer software for computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM); Engineering services, namely, providing analysis of Phased Array and Full Matrix Capture data for use in inspecting the integrity of welding incorporated in sheet metal products; customized design of ultrasonic software; customized design of Phased Array and Total Focusing Method software; development of phased array probe for Total Focusing Method of mono-probes, of multi-probes, of phase network probes, of eddy current probes; providing online non-downloadable software for data processing, non-destructive testing inspections and signal image processing of welding incorporated in sheet metal products; all of the foregoing services relating to the non-destructive testing field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2025 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |