Drawing for COHESION

USPTO serial 97862418

COHESION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WERT, KARL ANTHONY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COHESION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Megan E. Spitz

Megan E. Spitz BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE8TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio speakers; amplifiers; electronic products for the manipulation of the frequency, time, and amplitude characteristics of audio signals, namely, audio processors; signal processors for audio speakers; digital signal processorsACTIVEJan 9, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 3, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 31, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 15, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 15, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 15, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 27, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 27, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Mar 29, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 1, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance