Drawing for KIDFILTER

USPTO serial 97862997

KIDFILTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDFILTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin S. Cornuelle

Kristin S. Cornuelle Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for verifying conversations and interactions between users and companion robots meet specified conditions; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for keeping conversations and interactions between users and companion robots from including prohibited topics; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software to ensure that a user and a companion robot are engaging in safe topics in conversations and interactions between users and companion robots; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software utilizing artificial intelligence to reduce or eliminate unsafe topics in conversations and interactions between users and companion robots; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for simulating conversations and interactions; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for replying to questions verbally and non-verbally from users who are interfacing and interacting with companion robots; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software using artificial intelligence for replying to questions verbally and non-verbally from users who are interfacing and interacting with companion robots; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for allowing an interchange between users and robots and digital characters to interface and engage by analyzing and providing facial expressions, body language and natural language; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for verifying conversations and interactions between users and companion robots meet specified conditions; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for keeping conversations and interactions between users and companion robots from including prohibited topics; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software to ensure that a user and a companion robot are engaging in safe topics in conversations and interactions between users and companion robots; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software utilizing artificial intelligence to reduce or eliminate unsafe topics in conversations and interactions between users and companion robots; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for simulating conversations and interactions; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for replying to questions verbally and non-verbally from users who are interfacing and interacting with companion robots; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for replying to questions verbally and non-verbally from users who are interfacing and interacting with companion robotsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 2, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 29, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 29, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 26, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance