Drawing for OPENINFRA FOUNDATION PLATINUM MEMBER

USPTO serial 97863013

OPENINFRA FOUNDATION PLATINUM MEMBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NODES,CHRISTOPHER JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPENINFRA FOUNDATION PLATINUM MEMBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price and Sean T. Phelan

Andrew D. Price and Sean T. Phelan VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
200indicating membership in an organization that supports the development and adoption of open source infrastructure, including cloud storage, network and compute software, and helps establish communities and manage projects that advance areas where technology can contribute to the development of open source cloud computing infrastructure and related softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2023MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance