USPTO serial 97864696
OPERATOR XR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPERATOR XR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Gross
Michelle L. Gross MICHELLE L. GROSS, P.C.14362 N FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD. #1000SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, downloadable computer software for use in virtual reality training of law enforcement, military, and security personnel; downloadable computer training software for use in training law enforcement, military, and security personnel in tactical strategies; downloadable computer operating software for computer tablets; downloadable computer simulation software for training in the field of tactical strategies for law enforcement, military, and security personnel; downloadable computer application software for use with wearable computer devices; downloadable cloud-based software for use in the field of de-escalation tactics, use of force decision making, and operational procedures for law enforcement, military, and security personnel; downloadable computer software development kits primarily composed of downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface; downloadable virtual reality computer software; virtual reality equipment, namely, virtual reality headsets, virtual reality controllers and electronic controllers for use with virtual reality headsets; electronic controllers for virtual reality environments, other than for video games; virtual reality training systems primarily composed of downloadable computer software for simulating weapons training; wearable display monitors; electronic training simulators for use in virtual reality training of law enforcement, military and security personnel; motion, proximity, and pressure sensors; computers; computer hardware; digital PC tablets; electronic writing tablets; interactive computers for use in law enforcement, military, and security personnel training; electronic simulators for training personnel in the operation of weapons; electronic weapons simulators; computer based training apparatus, namely, retrofittable dry fire electronic training simulators for firearms; haptic systems primarily composed of haptic suits other than for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for use in virtual reality training of law enforcement, military, and security personnel; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in virtual reality training of law enforcement, military, and security personnel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |