USPTO serial 97865562
X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen J. Baden
Allen J. Baden BADEN LAW FIRM5646 MILTON ST STE 226DALLAS, TX 75206United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for use in building, operating and managing computing, virtualization, data storage, security, networking functions and the management, integration and unification of private, public, edge and hybrid clouds within enterprise, service and hosted providers and cloud datacenters; Computer software and downloadable computer software for enterprise and cloud computing infrastructure and platforms for the purpose of storage, computing, networking, security, virtualization and the management, integration and unification of private, public, edge and hybrid clouds in the field of enterprise and cloud computing; Computer software and hardware for use in hyperconverged and distributed computing, data storage, virtualization, computer system and network security, networking and the management thereof, computer software and hardware for use in the management and unification of public, private, edge and hybrid clouds, migration of virtualized applications, business continuity and data backup for computing systems and applications, disaster recovery, computer cluster management and provisioning, upgrade of software on computing servers, and database management including provisioning, backup, cloning, policies and access control for databases, computer software and hardware for use in ransomware detection and the management, integration and unification of private, public, edge and hybrid clouds; Computer software and downloadable computer software for use in hyperconverged and distributed computing, data storage, virtualization, computer system and network security, networking, and the management thereof, computer software and downloadable computer software for the management and unification of public, private, edge and hybrid clouds, migration of virtualized applications, business continuity and data backup for computing systems and applications, disaster recovery, computer cluster management and provisioning, upgrade of software on computing servers, and database management including provisioning, backup, cloning, policies, and access control for databases, and computer software and downloadable computer software for ransomware detection | ACTIVE | May 31, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |