Drawing for HOMEBASE CREDIT UNION

USPTO serial 97865891

HOMEBASE CREDIT UNION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEBASE CREDIT UNION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY WRIGHT

AMY WRIGHT TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLPONE INDIANA SQUARE, SUITE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Credit union servicesACTIVEJul 20, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 15, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Feb 18, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 18, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 3, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 25, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 25, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 25, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2023MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance