USPTO serial 97867090
BUBLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEENAN, CAYLA FAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUBLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guangdong Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard M. Cohn
Howard M. Cohn HOWARD M. COHN AND ASSOCIATES50 PUBLIC SQ., SUITE 2200CLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Sphygmomanometers; Teethers; Bite trays; Cosmetic apparatus using ultrasonic waves for performing aesthetic facial treatment procedures; Cupping glasses; Foot massage apparatus; Hair prostheses; Massage chairs with built-in electric massage apparatus; Massage sticks; Menstrual cups; Orthopaedic footwear; Phototherapeutic apparatus for the treatment of jaundice; Pill crushers; Supports for flat feet; Tongue scrapers | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |