USPTO serial 97872870
ITALIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITALIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOMINIC A. ROTA
DOMINIC A. ROTA BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.1600 WEST END AVENUE, SUITE 2000NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Print-fulfillment services in the nature of order fulfillment services; print-project management services in the nature of business management services | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2018 |
| 040 | Digital printing; digital printing services in the field of business-to-business and business-to-consumer commerce, namely, custom digital-printing services, web-to-print services, and color-management services in the nature of printing visual elements and communications being art prints, postcards, greeting cards, pitch and media kits, point of purchase (POP) displays, gifting kits, event invitations, product-launch promotional material, and seeding packages for print, product, product-packaging, and other communication media; digital-printing consultation services, namely, consultancy relating to print-proofing services in the nature of printing visual elements and communications being art prints, postcards, greeting cards, pitch and media kits, retail displays and installations, point of purchase (POP) displays, gifting kits, event invitations, product-launch promotional material, and seeding packages for print, product, product-packaging, and other communication media | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |