Drawing for LUSH LOCKS

USPTO serial 97874668

LUSH LOCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUSH LOCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger N. Behle, Jr.

Roger N. Behle, Jr. FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP15 W CARRILLO STREET SUITE 200SANTA BARBARA CA, CA 93101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Hair extensions; Hair pieces; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair weaves; False hair; Human hair; Human hair for use as wigs and hair pieces; Human braiding hair; Synthetic braiding hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 27, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 25, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 5, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 20, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance