USPTO serial 97877862
GAMEFAQS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAMEFAQS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olivia M. Clavio
OLIVIA M. CLAVIO TYZ LAW GROUP PC4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, FLOOR 14SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of entertainment, video games, computer games, and gaming; Providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for social networking; Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, and messages; Providing a website featuring chatrooms and online forums for users to post, transmit messages, and comment on content in the fields of entertainment, video games, computer games, and gaming | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1996 |
| 041 | Entertainment, educational, and information services, namely, providing news reporting services and blogs in the fields of electronic gaming, high-tech gaming gadgets, electronic gaming culture, entertainment, popular culture, and consumer gaming electronics; Providing current events news in the fields of high-tech gadgets, high technology, electronic commerce, and consumer electronics presented in audio, video, graphics, text and data, via a global communication network, video, the Internet, websites, videos, blogs, and portable and wireless communication devices; Entertainment services, namely, providing online reviews of video and computer games, and online gaming and electronic gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring online non-downloadable multimedia content in the nature of videos, images, pictures, photos, text, user-generated text content, audio recordings, and gaming information, all in the field of video games and electronic games | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1996 |
| 042 | Providing a website that features a wide range of news, information and commentary in the fields of computing and design, and the development of computers and computer software; Providing a website featuring technology that enables Internet users to create and share entertainment, popular culture, online gaming, and electronic gaming information | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |