Drawing for GLITTERALLY PERFECT

USPTO serial 97887864

GLITTERALLY PERFECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRAG, SHERIF G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLITTERALLY PERFECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMANDA V. DWIGHT

AMANDA V. DWIGHT BURKHALTER KESSLER CLEMENT & GEORGE LLP2020 MAIN STREET, SUITE 600, SUITE 600IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Eye-shadow; Eye linerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2025MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2025ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2025EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2025EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 2024GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2024GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2024CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2024GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 19, 2024GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 19, 2024CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2024IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 24, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 21, 2024RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 21, 2024RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2024RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 21, 2024GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2024GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 19, 2024AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 19, 2024IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 19, 2024EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 29, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance